What to Make of Recent Market Performance

What to Make of Recent Market Performance

by Zach Marsh on Sep 25, 2020

For the week, the S&P 500 was down a little over 1%, which brings the month-to-date downturn to a touch over 6.5%. The stock market, which has been led higher over the last six months by technology stocks, has been dragged down by the higher flying tech names. Amazon, Facebook, Apple, and Google parent Alphabet are all down an average of 13.7% this month. Complicating matters for the large-cap index is the fact that we have not really seen a rotation into broader names. Traditional value stocks like Exxon Mobil, Johnson and Johnson, and JP Morgan have all fallen this month, albeit to a lesser degree. Last week I pointed out the significant outperformance of the Nasdaq 100 vs. the small-cap Russell 2000 index, which has reached levels approaching the tech bubble era of the late ‘90s.

Further evidence of the narrowness of this years US stock performance can be seen by the outperformance of the cap-weighted S&P 500 index vs the S&P 500 equal-weighted index. The cap-weighted index performance is skewed towards the outsized weightings of the aforementioned big tech stocks.

  

While the more broadly followed cap-weighted index is up fractionally year-to-date, the equal-weighted index is down over 7%. If the mortality rate of coronavirus has discriminated against one segment of the population, the pandemic has also discriminated between winners and losers.  

The challenges this month have not been born by the stock market alone. Diversified portfolios have also not been immune to the pullback in prices. The performance across a diversified array of assets has been fairly correlated since the pandemic hit. Gold and US Treasury bonds have held up, and even continued to ride higher with broad market stock indices from March through August. Unfortunately, this correlation has largely remained intact this month, but with all assets falling in synchronicity. Gold, which had been one of the best performing assets all year, has fallen over 5% this month. It now sits roughly 10% below its 52 week high set in early August. Gold’s weakness can be laid at the feet of a recent bounce in the US dollar, which could prove to be short-lived should one party sweep the election in November. My belief is that we will continue to see larger government deficits should either party sweep the elections. This prospect should/could provide additional tailwinds for gold.

Portfolio diversification traditionally proves its value during periods of low asset correlation. A diversified approach is the best way to protect your money from unknown future outcomes, but this approach can prove sub-optimal during equity bull markets. Diversification can also be harder to stick with because its real benefit is typically experienced during sub-optimal environments, such as bear markets and recessions.

I continue to maintain that the “bear market” we experienced in February and March was a bear market in name only. While the percentage drop was significant, the time spent underwater for the stock market was, in fact, shorter than many much smaller corrections. Bear market drawdowns are tough because they erode not only equity but time. It remains to be seen if we are on the verge of entering a more prolonged period of stock market underperformance. This week’s stock market performance, while negative, offered glimmers of hope that the market may be forming a new base well above its prior base level set in early July. Up trends are marked by a successive pattern of higher highs and higher lows, for now the current up trend which began in March remains in place today.  

Thanks for reading,

Zach and Dave  

 

      

 

 

   Disclosures

All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided, nor any opinion expressed, constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Calibrate Wealth LLC, does not provide tax or legal advice respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Calibrate Wealth. Individuals are encouraged to consult their tax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account.

 

This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without

regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The strategies

and/or investments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. Calibrate Wealth

recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and

strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a Financial Advisor. The appropriateness of a

particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of

factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii)

governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war

and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities

and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other

disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and

government intervention.

 

Foreign currencies may have significant price movements, even within the same day, and any currency

held in an account may lose value against other currencies. Foreign currency exchanges depend on the

relative values of two different currencies and are therefore subject to the risk of fluctuations caused by

a variety of economic and political factors in each of the two relevant countries, as well as global

pressures. These risks include national debt levels, trade deficits and balance of payments, domestic and

foreign interest rates and inflation, global, regional or national political and economic events, monetary

policies of governments and possible government intervention in the currency markets, or other

markets.