Market Commentary for Week Ended 02/21/2020

Market Commentary for Week Ended 02/21/2020

by Zach Marsh on Feb 21, 2020

What Goes Up Must Come Down


The market hit an icy patch late this week, exhibiting signs of acrophobia, or the fear of heights.  And can you blame it?  For context, on Wednesday the Nasdaq 100 made an all-time high of 9718, a full 28.7% higher than its levels in early October.  Additionally, since the beginning of 2019 large cap growth stocks have outperformed large cap value stocks by over 24%.  Since the late 2016 growth has outperformed value by over 40%.  It may seem redundant to say we are in or entering some sort of growth/tech market bubble.

In the last year of the Tech Bubble, 1999, growth similarly outperformed value by 24% and in the last 4 years of the great tech rally growth outperformed value by 43.2%.  It is hard not to draw comparisons between the two events when there are so many factors that are rhyming at the moment.  And the similarities don’t stop there. 

As the ‘90’s were drawing to a close many stocks tech stocks began to explode in value absent any real rational reason.  Some of these stocks are long since defunct, like or, but many are still around, currently trading at a fraction of their 2000 levels.  Juniper Networks once traded as high as $220 per share, now shares trade hands at $24/share.  Cisco Systems traded as high as $80/share in 2000, now it can be had for $31/share. 

We tend to overlook the Tech Collapse because the Financial Crisis is much fresher in our minds, but the 2 ½ year decline in stock values between 2000-2002 saw the Nasdaq 100 lose over 82% of its value!  That makes the 60% decline in the S&P 500 in 2008 look somewhat modest by comparison.  Each day that passes and I see stocks like Virgin Galactic Holdings and Tesla accumulate short-term gains eclipsing 100-200%, the more certain I am that we are in a period of irrational exuberance.  Money is chasing around the next hot idea expecting to double or triple within a few weeks—that is an indicator that greed is in control while fear takes a backseat. 

The little slip that the market showed between mid-day Thursday and into today should hardly qualify as a dip to buy when we see what real dips looked like in 2000.  During three short weeks in 2000, from March 28-April 14, the Nasdaq fell over 30%.  By comparison, this week’s 2%+ decline is just a deck chair on the Titanic.   I can’t say whether the market will have a similar fall this time around, I just know that the hairs on the back of my neck are starting to rise.



All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Calibrate Wealth LLC, does not provide tax or legal advice and are not “fiduciaries” (under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise) with respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Calibrate Wealth. Individuals are encouraged to consult their tax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account.


This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without

regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The strategies

and/or investments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. Calibrate Wealth

recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and

strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a Financial Advisor. The appropriateness of a

particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of

factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii)

governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war

and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities

and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other

disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and

government intervention.


Foreign currencies may have significant price movements, even within the same day, and any currency

held in an account may lose value against other currencies. Foreign currency exchanges depend on the

relative values of two different currencies and are therefore subject to the risk of fluctuations caused by

a variety of economic and political factors in each of the two relevant countries, as well as global

pressures. These risks include national debt levels, trade deficits and balance of payments, domestic and

foreign interest rates and inflation, global, regional or national political and economic events, monetary

policies of governments and possible government intervention in the currency markets, or other