9/28 Weekly Update

9/28 Weekly Update

by Zach Marsh on Sep 28, 2018

Weekly Recap

S&P 500                -0.32%

10 Year Treasury   +0.14%

Gold                      -0.24%

Volatility              +4.7%





Market Update:  3rd Quarter Market Recap


The 3rd Quarter went out with a bit of a whimper this week.  The S&P 500 was down slightly, after posting a substantial 7,.25% gain for the quarter.  The Russell 2000 small-cap index was up nearly 3.25%, despite being down over 2.5% from its August highs.  Stocks remain very much en vogue and may well continue their ascent through the end of the year.  With the booming economy and rising markets, interest rates continue to climb as well.  How much longer the equity market can continue to climb in the face of rising rates is a question that we may well be asking in earnest next year. 

Currently, the yield on MUB, a municipal bond ETF consisting of high grade muni’s, is up to 2.34%.  While that is a tax-free rate of return, it only moderately surpasses the current inflation rate.  It is always an interesting dilemma determining the impact of rates and the attractiveness of bonds to equities.  At any precise moment in time bonds never appear attractive to stocks.  For example at the beginning of 2000 the average rate on a 5 year US Treasury Bond was 6.58%.  By today’s standards that seems extremely compelling, but inflation was hovering near 3% at the time, the S&P 500 was up over 14% the year prior, and the Nasdaq 100 index was up over 100% in 1999.  Given the other opportunities to make money, the 6.58% treasury seemed like a sucker’s bet.  Fast forward 5 years, and the 6.58% treasury bond was the best bet of the 3 options.  The S&P 500 total return between 2000-2004 was -12%, while the Nasdaq 100 was down an incredible -56.25%. 

The same story can be laid out in 2007 with 5 year bonds yielding 4.75%.  At the end of 2006 the housing market was still booming.  The S&P was up 15.61%, and the tech heavy Nasdaq 100 had risen over 115% from their lows in September 2002.  Five years later the S&P 500 was down -6.32% from its January 2007 levels, and the Nasdaq’s returns only just matched the return on a 5 year Treasury bond, with a lot more heartache. 

This is not to say that we now sit at the same precipice.  Predicting the end of the market’s run sometimes seems like a game played by charlatan’s; you say it enough eventually you’ll be right.  This is just a reminder that good times don’t last forever, and long term asset trends are very challenging to guess.


Thanks for reading,

Zach and Dave

Calibrate Wealth




All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Calibrate Wealth LLC, does not provide tax or legal advice and are not “fiduciaries” (under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise) with respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Calibrate Wealth. Individuals are encouraged to consult their tax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account.


This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without

regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The strategies

and/or investments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. Calibrate Wealth

recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and

strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a Financial Advisor. The appropriateness of a

particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of

factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii)

governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war

and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities

and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other

disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and

government intervention.


Foreign currencies may have significant price movements, even within the same day, and any currency

held in an account may lose value against other currencies. Foreign currency exchanges depend on the

relative values of two different currencies and are therefore subject to the risk of fluctuations caused by

a variety of economic and political factors in each of the two relevant countries, as well as global

pressures. These risks include national debt levels, trade deficits and balance of payments, domestic and

foreign interest rates and inflation, global, regional or national political and economic events, monetary

policies of governments and possible government intervention in the currency markets, or other