8/24/2018 Weekly Update: Stock Market Record, Does it Even Really Matter?

8/24/2018 Weekly Update: Stock Market Record, Does it Even Really Matter?

by Zach Marsh on Aug 24, 2018

Weekly Recap

S&P 500                +0.89%

10 Year Treasury   +0.41%

Gold                      +1.5%

Volatility              -5.14%

 

 

 

Weekly Update:  Stock Market Record, Does it Even Really Matter?

 

The headline news this week is that the current stock market rally has now become the longest running bull market in history.  What, you thought I was going to mention the news about guilty verdicts and guilty pleas and a presidency on the brink of disaster?  Ok, sorry the second biggest news item this week was the stock market’s record run.  

For those who weren’t paying attention, on Wednesday the stock market “officially” set the record for the longest consecutive stretch without the interruption of a bear market.  While this news is certainly noteworthy, the cynic in me finds reason to question the integrity of the record.  Like Maris hitting 61 homers in 162 games vs 154 games for Ruth, or heaven forbid the cloud hanging over McGwire and Bonds, this record raises some questions.  First of all, the definition, according to those who measure these things, of a bear market is a decline in the S&P 500 Index of greater than 20%.  The gray area is about how we mark the top and the bottom of a market decline.  Namely, do we measure the top to bottom based upon market closing levels or intraday highs and lows.  If one chooses intraday levels to measure declines, then this current bull market began on October 4, 2011, not March 9, 2009.   

In 2011, as Europe teetered on the brink of collapse, the US stock market declined from an intraday high of 1370.58 on May 2nd to an intraday low of 1074.77 on October 4th, or a 21.5% decline.  This clearly meets the definition of bear market.  If we use intraday levels to market bear markets then the longest running bull market was between October 11, 1990 and July 20, 1998, roughly 2,837 days.  Currently, we are on day number 2,514.  Not quite there. 

If instead we insisted upon closing levels, it would seem the 90’s rally gets the shaft once again.  The 1990 “bear market,” declined from a high of 369.78 to 295.46 in a little over a month.  This marked a decline of just 20.01%, just barely reaching bear market territory.  It seems as if we could really go around in circles over whether we have reached a milestone or not.  For me it all seems rather trivial, sorry for wasting your time, because what really matters most is not the depth of the decline as much as it is the length of time it takes to reach a bottom and recover.  Twenty percent declines are not fun, but more destructive to wealth is the time it takes to recover.  The bear market beginning in 1973, top to bottom, lasted roughly 1.5 years, but it took the market until 1982 until it permanently eclipsed the 1973 highs.  In my book, that is a bear market. Quibbling over whether a market declined 19.5% or 20.01% if it only remained below the previous highs for 7 or 8 months is pretty meaningless.  The 1990’s bull market ended with the collapse of technology stocks in 2000.  The market never, truly recovered those highs until 2013, that was painful.  As it stands, this current bull market remains one of the least appreciated market runs.  Aside from the run up in January there has been little signs of euphoria in the market price action.  This lack of euphoria can bode well for the rally to continue on for awhile longer. 

 

Thanks for reading,

Zach and Dave

Calibrate Wealth
515-371-5316
  

https://www.calibratewm.com/blog-01

 

Disclosures

All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Calibrate Wealth LLC, does not provide tax or legal advice and are not “fiduciaries” (under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise) with respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Calibrate Wealth. Individuals are encouraged to consult their tax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account.

 

This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without

regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The strategies

and/or investments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. Calibrate Wealth

recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and

strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a Financial Advisor. The appropriateness of a

particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of

factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii)

governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war

and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities

and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other

disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and

government intervention.

 

Foreign currencies may have significant price movements, even within the same day, and any currency

held in an account may lose value against other currencies. Foreign currency exchanges depend on the

relative values of two different currencies and are therefore subject to the risk of fluctuations caused by

a variety of economic and political factors in each of the two relevant countries, as well as global

pressures. These risks include national debt levels, trade deficits and balance of payments, domestic and

foreign interest rates and inflation, global, regional or national political and economic events, monetary

policies of governments and possible government intervention in the currency markets, or other

markets.