6/7/2019 Weekly Update: A Change of Heart

6/7/2019 Weekly Update: A Change of Heart

by Zach Marsh on Jun 7, 2019

Weekly Recap                                                                        

S&P 500                +4.47%

10 Year Treasury   +0.29%

Gold                      +2.64%

Volatility              -13%


Weekly Update: A Change of Heart

Late, last December, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve pushed forward with an interest rate hike at a time of escalating trade tension and falling global stock markets.  In my update letter on December 21, I described his actions as a dereliction of duty.  I believed at that moment, while it is of utmost importance that we, one day find ourselves weened off of perpetually low interest rates, that the Fed’s actions actually called into question their ability to raise rates in the future. 

The Fed, by artificially pushing rates higher, against prevailing market conditions, ultimately painted themselves in a corner, where they would be left with only one direction left to travel—back in the direction from whence they came.  Now, less than six months later, with the Fed set to meet in 11 days, the question before them now will be:  should they cut rates, or simply pause?  Currently, the prevailing market prediction is that there is only a 25% chance of a rate cut at the next meeting, but by the July meeting date, the futures market is pricing in a near certainty that the Fed acts to lower rates. 

So, why such the change of heart?  After all, markets are actually up almost 20% since the Fed last raised rates.  I suppose this gets to the heart of market dynamics—something that can be defined as first derivative and second derivative thinking or projection.  The market, via millions and millions of participants with intersecting and conflicting ideas on market valuations and interest rates, ultimately and unintentionally, creates a better model than one that can be developed in an academic vacuum.  The market, by its price action, recognized, beginning in January, that the Fed had painted themselves in a corner, and that the only action left would be for future easing, not contracting, i.e. second derivative thinking.  This can explain why markets are up significantly since the last Fed rate hike in December, even though there has been no actual rate cut, nor has there been an answer to the building trade wars.

The difference between first and second derivative thinking is sort of like the George Bernard Shaw quote on how he sees the world.  He said, “You see things; and you say ‘Why?’  But I dream of things that never were; and say, ‘Why not?’”[1]  Yet, instead of the why’s and why not’s, second derivative thinking sees things as they are and ponders about what we will see next—whereas first derivative thinking simply adheres to the current environment.  The market, because of the collision of models and ideas achieves second derivative thinking more naturally.  The Fed seems helplessly stuck in first gear. 

What is the market now telling us?  Over the last couple weeks we have seen gold and treasury bond prices rise dramatically, while oil and copper have fallen.  Copper and oil prices falling, and Treasury Bond prices rallying, typically indicates slumping growth, or a potential recession.  Rising gold prices is a bit of a wildcard signal, in concert with other rising asset prices, this typically would signal inflation concerns.  However, gold also can act as a safe haven trade when stock markets are in turmoil.  The consensus from these signals would have to be, in the face of rising stock prices this week, for potential stock market tremors later this summer and early fall.

Thanks for reading,

Zach and Dave

Calibrate Wealth





All opinions are subject to change without notice. Neither the information provided nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.  Tax laws are complex and subject to change. Calibrate Wealth LLC, does not provide tax or legal advice and are not “fiduciaries” (under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise) with respect to the services or activities described herein except as otherwise provided in writing by Calibrate Wealth. Individuals are encouraged to consult their tax and legal advisors (a) before establishing a retirement plan or account, and (b) regarding any potential tax, ERISA and related consequences of any investments made under such plan or account.


This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without

regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The strategies

and/or investments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors. Calibrate Wealth

recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and

strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a Financial Advisor. The appropriateness of a

particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

Investing in commodities entails significant risks. Commodity prices may be affected by a variety of

factors at any time, including but not limited to, (i) changes in supply and demand relationships, (ii)

governmental programs and policies, (iii) national and international political and economic events, war

and terrorist events, (iv) changes in interest and exchange rates, (v) trading activities in commodities

and related contracts, (vi) pestilence, technological change and weather, and (vii) the price volatility of a commodity. In addition, the commodities markets are subject to temporary distortions or other

disruptions due to various factors, including lack of liquidity, participation of speculators and

government intervention.


Foreign currencies may have significant price movements, even within the same day, and any currency

held in an account may lose value against other currencies. Foreign currency exchanges depend on the

relative values of two different currencies and are therefore subject to the risk of fluctuations caused by

a variety of economic and political factors in each of the two relevant countries, as well as global

pressures. These risks include national debt levels, trade deficits and balance of payments, domestic and

foreign interest rates and inflation, global, regional or national political and economic events, monetary

policies of governments and possible government intervention in the currency markets, or other



[1] Sorry Robert Kennedy, the original goes to Shaw